Looking at the painting, one edge was not, was a continuous and infinite color change. I was disappointed to see that the strokes were closer, like a work of art should ask perfect the artist, as if the limit of visual perception fades away with the brush strokes. I did not understand the forms and their psychology in the sketches. The museum was just, just a guard reading a brochure of a mall. I felt stupid for not understanding that the artist meant to those curves and deformation in humans.
drew a series of matrices in a paper in A3, I tried to write calligraphy watching the whole series of calculations in a collinearity condition concrete example. Expanded form mathematics forms of great beauty and privacy. The mathematical expression faded as it reached the final result. Just an array of 15 results. Several pages of difficult to understand for beginners, it might be art, when an expression of natural behavior observation of events in the world.
I thought, seeing the artist's works that would never fully understand the author meant. As far as I read, I did not trust what he said interpreting. Sansación gave the interpretation that was invented to avoid stripping.
Despite reasonably understand succession of mathematical expressions, I lost confidence in its result by inserting the original values \u200b\u200bin the matrix determinant. There were so many and such vast numbers of parents, I was unable to etender the process beyond the calculation and issue to issue its general interpretation. A dark halo appears to follow the math yet understood or believing to have understood.
definitely not find art in mathematics, or mathematics in art, not understanding that both are forms of expression that are trying to solve and make us understand the behavior of life beyond our sensory capacities. That habit of always separate what has been attached ... Such is the confusion, I've spent half my life looking for common ground between art and science, making them the same thing.
0 comments:
Post a Comment